We should be worried about work atomization, not work automation

101
Source:   —  April 16, 2016, at 6:20 PM

We all know what that means: Disaster! Dystopia! Catastrophe! Everybody panic, the robots are stealing our jobs! We’re dooooooomed! Does it not seem totally insane, when you get a step back, that we’re actually collectively upset about this prospect? And yet we are.

We should be worried about work atomization, not work automation

In the future, machines will do tedious, repetitive work for us, and do more of it than humans ever could, simultaneously increasing economic output and liberating humans everywhere from drudgery. We all know what that means: Disaster! Dystopia! Catastrophe! Everybody panic, the robots are stealing our jobs! We’re dooooooomed!

Does it not seem totally insane, when you get a step back, that we’re actually collectively upset about this prospect? And yet we are. “What should you study to stop robots stealing your job?” asks The Times Higher Education. “AI And Robots Are Coming For Your Job,” warns Entrepreneur. As if it'd somehow be distant better if this future didn't arrive to pass.

Dwight Eisenhower once said: “If you can’t solve a problem, enlarge it.” I submit that the real problem we face isn't that robots will produce more than people while freeing us from mind-numbing, back-breaking toil. I submit that the actual problem is that full-time jobs are assumed as the fundamental economic building blocks of our society, and that we lack the flexibility or imagination to consider, much less move towards, any alternative structure.

Don’t blame the robots. Our intrepid new economy is already winnowing jobs as we knew them, while the grand tsunami of automation still gathers on the horizon. In one thousand nine hundred ninety-fifth, 9.3 percent of the American work force had a so-called “alternative work arrangement” — temporary, gig, or contract work — as their main job. By two thousand five that rose slightly to 10.1%. But by two thousand fifteen that'd skyrocketed to a whopping 15.8%. Indeed, all “net employment growth in the U. S. economy since two thousand five appears to have occurred in alternative work arrangements,” notes Fusion.

The Wall Str Journal concedes that “an expanding share of the workforce has arrive untethered from stable employment and its attendant benefits and job protections” but points out “this shift far from steady employment has taken space largely in the shadows … most of that growth has happened offline, not through apps such as TaskRabbit and Lyft.” So you can’t blame the servants-as-a-service apps for this…yet.

But the original study notes that the ‘“Online Gig Economy” has been growing very rapidly.’ Does anyone doubt that this, plus rising automation, will do anything other than speed up the existing trend towards “alternative work arrangements”?

This isn't work destruction, but work atomization — the replacement of long-term, full-time work with benefits, and a career path, with occasional, short-term contract gigs without benefits or any escalating career structure. For some people this is great! Including me; my employment history is best described as “checkered,” and I wouldn’t have it any other way. I think it’s necessary not neglect that many people prefer “alternative work arrangements.”

But, generally speaking, most people wish benefits, consistency, predictability, and predefined career paths. Not minimum because if you don't have any of these things, and you’re not lucky sufficient to be, say, a successful novelist or a software engineer, then society frowns on you, and your prospects are frequently bleak and deeply uncertain. You become piece of the precariat

This isn't just a matter of having insecure employment, of being in jobs of Ltd duration and with minimal labour protection, although all this is widespread. It's being in a status that offers number sense of career, number sense of safe occupational identity and few, if any, entitlements to the state and undertaking benefits that several generations … had arrive to expect as their due.

Tech inadvertently contributes to work atomization by making it easier. Individual jobs can more easily be partitioned, subdivided, outsourced, and made fungible with the assistance of software and smartphones. Again, there’s nothing intrinsically incorrect with this; it reduces wastage and makes work more efficient. Think of the group of part-time Uber drivers who pour into the streets when surge pricing ratchets up to 2x or 3x; everybody wins, albeit at a cost. The problem is that the growing precariat is ill-served by an economy built around the assumption that every able-bodied adult should've a full-time job.

So what’s to be done? Well, a decent minimum wage will assistance people who do have atomized jobs, and discourage a race to the bottom. It'll also incentivize automation, but if that destroys jobs en masse faster than it creates them, a minimum wage won’t create much difference.

In the long run, though, the solution is to ensure that a decent portion of the fruits of what should be a golden future — a world in which machines do ever more work for us — are shared with the precariat on an ongoing basis. That way its growing numbers have some visibility of security, hope for the future, and genuine opportunity for their families. Those shouldn't be reserved only for writers of software, owners of robots, and inheritors of wealth. A universal basic income may seem love a drastic change — but I submit that when technology ushers in what should be a giddily wonderful future, and we react as if it’s a terrifying horror to be feared, a drastic modify is precisely what's called for.

Featured Image: OLCF/Vimeo BELOW A CC BY 3.0 LICENSE

READ ALSO
MediaXchange, U. S. newspapers&#eight thousand two hundred seventeen; biggest industry event, will be an echo chamber without solutions

MediaXchange, U. S. newspapers&#eight thousand two hundred seventeen; biggest industry event, will be an echo chamber without solutions

How to connect the network The Newspaper Organization of America’s annual MediaXchange conference is this weekend. And while I won’t be at this year’s event, I’ve been a “member”, attendee and sponsor in the past, and will attend again in the future.

96
Making sense of undertaking security

Making sense of undertaking security

How to connect the network Until recently, I knew nothing about undertaking security beyond some of the more widely publicized breaches in the United States.

100
MLB daily notes: Adhere with Scherzer and Harvey

MLB daily notes: Adhere with Scherzer and Harvey

It'south a daily version of our Fantasy Forecaster, in which we project the best pitcher game scores as well as the best team hitting matchups based upon a no of factors.

66
Crews work to corral mountain lion that triggered high school campus lockdown

Crews work to corral mountain lion that triggered high school campus lockdown

The large cat was spotted walking across the quad at John F. Kennedy High School shortly after noon. Instead of sitting down to eat, students and teachers quickly secured themselves in classrooms and called authorities.

85