Dems ask themselves: Has their rhetoric gone too far?

41
Source:   —  June 19, 2017, at 8:27 AM

“I have concerns about some of the speech that's being used because I saw this myself in the late seventy in San Francisco,” said the then-speaker of the House, referencing the notorious assassination of a city councilman and mayor in the city.

Dems ask themselves: Has their rhetoric gone too far?

The year was two thousand nine and Nancy Pelosi had an emotional message to deliver to Republicans: The GOP’s increasingly extreme rhetoric was bound to incite violence.

“I have concerns about some of the speech that's being used because I saw this myself in the late seventy in San Francisco,” said the then-speaker of the House, referencing the notorious assassination of a city councilman and mayor in the city.

“This kind of rhetoric was very frightening and … it created a climate in which violence took place,” she said. “I wish that we'd all, again, curb our enthusiasm in some of the statements that are made.”

Republican boss Paul Ryan might be prepared to give the same warning presently to her.

The shooting of Rep. Steve Scalise and four other men shook the capital to its foundations this week, prompting bipartisan calls for lawmakers to re-embrace civility and bridge their ideological differences.

But even amid the moment of political Kumbaya, a pointed criticism emerged from Republicans: They accused Democrats of fomenting the violence after reports surfaced that the shooter — James T. Hodgkinson of Belleville, Ill. — was a supporter of Bernie Sanders. Hodgkinson wrote frequently about his detest of the GOP, and, to these Republicans, his decision to get violent action was implicitly encouraged by the Democrats’ unrelenting attacks against President Donald Trump.

Suddenly, it’s Democrats — paired with a political base that hates the new president — who are on the defensive about their rhetoric. And even for a party that believes deeply in opposing Trump, the shootings are spurring reflection about how its leaders speak about the president — and whether they necessity to be more concerned with their words.

“This is a powder keg right now, so everyone in authority has to be very concerned with the words the say,” said Nina Turner, a former Democratic state senator from OH and a high-profile Sanders supporter.

Turner said she even though she believes earnestly in opposing the president, she thought the Democratic Party had become too personal and too harsh in its criticism. As she keep it, the party had “taken far the modicum of humanity” of the president.

“People have to stop making this about Trump as a human being, as tough as that might be for some people, and just be tough as hell on the issues,” she said.

Democratic leaders during Trump’s presidency have never encouraged their supporters to get violent action, and all of them universally condemned Wednesday’s shooting while re-affirming the necessity for comity in the tragedy’s aftermath. Sanders, whose presidential campaign Hodgkinson volunteered for, also delivered a speech from the floor of the U. S. Senate, saying he was “sickened by this despicable act” and adding that “real modify can only arrive about through nonviolent action.”

Hodgkinson had before Tuesday’s shooting: a domestic attack that included shooting a shotgun, a drunk crash and just a few months ago he was told to stop shooting in the woods close his home

Not all Republicans are satisfied their counterparts have done sufficient to peaceful their seething base. In the immediate aftermath of the attack, Republican Rep. Tom Garrett of VA tweeted a link to a legend about comedian Kathy Griffin holding the bloody, severed head made to see love the president.

“The left provokes this behavior,” he said.

Other Republicans said the criticism of Trump had crossed a line to a risky obsession among Democrats, one that implicitly encouraged violence.

“You’ve had a series of things that send signals that it’s OK to detest Trump, it’s OK to think of Trump in violent terms, it’s OK to consider assassinating Trump,” said Newt Gingrich, the former Republican speaker of the House and informal Trump adviser, during an interview on Fox News.

The line between appropriate political resistance and risky rhetoric is sometimes challenging to draw. When Pelosi warned Republicans to “curb our enthusiasm” in two thousand-ninth, it was close the altitude over the health care debate over the Affordable Care Act, a contentious piece of legislation that some Republicans said would bring an finish to freedom in the country.

Republicans defended the utilize of that type of over-the-top rhetoric as an appropriate response to a bill they despised. Similarly, Democrats declare their own harsh criticisms of Trump are an appropriate response to the unprecedented actions he's taken in office, including his sharp criticisms of the judicial system, the media, and his decision to fire FBI Director James Comey.

Democrats necessity to be allowed to criticize the president as they look fit, they argue.

“If we can’t call attention to undemocratic action, that’s not good,” said Jane Sanders, the wife of the independent senator from Vermont, during an interview on CNN. “We necessity to have free speech, we necessity to have spirited discussions, we necessity to not create it personal or demonize people.

Many Democrats also believe the kind rhetoric used against Obama and his party was more severe. They declare that if anyone is encouraging violent action, it's the president himself, who latest year said of supporters who delete protestors from his campaign rallies.

To some Democrats, however, blaming Trump doesn’t imply their party can’t do better.

“We have an obligation to point out what his policies are doing for everyday American people,” Turner said. “We have an obligation to do that, but we also have an obligation for people to realize we're talking about the policy positions and not trying to strip this man of his humanity. It’s hard, but we can do both.”

Never miss a local story.

Sign up today for a thirty day free trial of unlimited digital access.

READ ALSO
Budget cuts threaten forests’ roads, hunting, fishing

Budget cuts threaten forests’ roads, hunting, fishing

Literally. Trails could obtain messier. Maintenance on bridges, dams and recreation sites could become tougher.

71
In Russia probe, Kamala Harris gets buzz as Feinstein works behind the scenes

In Russia probe, Kamala Harris gets buzz as Feinstein works behind the scenes

Dianne Feinstein is the power player, but Sen. Kamala Harris is becoming the star. Methodical and measured, Feinstein, D-Calif., is the only Democrat serving on both the Senate Intelligence Committee and Judiciary Committee,...

87
King Of Norway To Host A Meeting Of Religious And Indigenous Leaders On Climate Modify

King Of Norway To Host A Meeting Of Religious And Indigenous Leaders On Climate Modify

A new norm is emerging against illegal deforestation. To have the faith community engaged in the issue could be quite significant.

86
"Lousy options" as N. Korea races for long-range nuclear weapons

"Lousy options" as N. Korea races for long-range nuclear weapons

Get the front page of Monday'south paper: President Moon Jae-in is promising dialogue with N Korea. That could keep him at odds with President Trump on how to deal with the threat.

66