Sanders on Clinton: Not Unqualfied, Compromised

105
Source:   —  April 10, 2016, at 11:10 PM

After Clinton called Sanders "unprepared" to be president, Sanders responded he thought she was "unqualified." The chattering classes went off.

Sanders on Clinton: Not Unqualfied, Compromised

As the Sanders surge continues, the Democratic presidential contest has gotten
chippy. After Clinton called Sanders "unprepared" to be president, Sanders responded he thought she was "unqualified."

The chattering classes went off. Democrats were rending garments and ringing hands worried about the campaign getting too negative and personal. Guy Cecil, director of one of the Clinton armory of SuperPacs, played the inevitable sexist card. President Obama felt it required to weigh in, with his spokesman Eric Schultz saying Obama believes Clinton" comes to the race with more experience than any non-vice president in recent campaign history." More experience, in other words, than anyone except Al Gore, daddy Bush and Richard Nixon.

But the kerfuffle was all nonsense. Sanders doesn't think Clinton is "unqualified," as he quickly acknowledged. He's repeatedly paid respect to her experience and qualifications. And the rhetorical misstatement frankly wasn't all that harsh. Qualifications haven't been the centerpiece of the Sanders-Clinton race, but they were in the Clinton-Obama face-off in two thousand-eighth. They didn't differ all that much on ideology or program. Clinton'south major attack on Obama was that he was simply unqualified. Recollect the ad with the ominous call at 3:00 in the morning? And for harsh rhetoric, Sanders' misstatement was nothing compared to Clinton'south scorning Obama in comparison to her and their putative Republican opponent, John McCain. Senator McCain, she said, "will keep forth his lifetime of experience. I'll keep forth my lifetime of experience. Senator Obama will keep forth a speech he made in 2002." Ouch.

Sanders' critique of Clinton isn't that she's unqualified or inexperienced. It's distant tougher and more substantive. His campaign is premised on the trust that she's too compromised and conservative to be the president we need. It isn't about character or experience; it's about direction, program and independence.

Sanders argues that our economy is rigged to favor the few, and our politics is corrupted by the huge money, special interests and revolving door appointments that hold fixing the game. He argues we necessity fundamental change, not simply piecemeal or incremental reform if we're to create this economy work for working people once more.

Sanders is running because he believes that Clinton is too compromised in her agenda. He's defined major substantive areas of disagreement: on corporate trade policies, on the necessity for major public investment and a sweeping initiative to get on global warming, on national health care, on breaking up the large banks and curbing Wall Street, on progressive taxation that'll pay for tuition free public college, on $15.00 an hr minimum wage and empowering workers to organize, on dialing down our interventionist foreign policy and more.

Clinton has moved to adopt a bolder reform position this year than in two thousand-eighth or before. She'south basically at one with President Obama'south policies. Yes, she'south arrive out against the president'south Transpacific Partnership deal, but everyone believes that's just campaign positioning. She claims to be tough on Wall Street, but even her Wall Str donors don't believe her. She'south assiduously avoided embracing the Warren-Sanders reform agenda. She'south keep forth a excellent agenda on global warming, but opposes putting a price on carbon, opposes banning fracking, and hasn't made climate modify a centerpiece of her campaign. She'south scorned Sanders call for national health care or for tuition free college. She'south been a supporter of the regime modify follies from Iraq, to Honduras to Libya to Syria to the Ukraine.

Sanders also argues that Clinton is too compromised by the large money that's central to financing her campaign. He decided to forego any SuperPacs and to crowd source the financing of his campaign because he believes that huge money compromises candidates. Clinton claims this insults her character. But everyday experience and a legion of academic studies prove that money perverts our politics, that the wealthy and the entrenched interests obtain their way, even when the majority are opposed. It'south kind to blame Republican obstruction, but the heart of the economic policies that are failing working people - corporate trade deals, deregulation, skewed and loophole ridden tax code, starved public investment, corporate subsidies and crony capitalist arrangements and much more - appreciate bipartisan support.

Clinton harshly attacked Obama as unqualified in two thousand-eighth. But the harsh rhetoric didn't obtain in the way of the party uniting in the fall. Whatever the differences inflated for the primaries, the two basically agreed on politics and policies. And, of course, both were both funded by similar deep pockets.

Sanders has been -- despite all the fretting interior the beltway -- a remarkably courtly opponent to Clinton. He hasn't unleashed oppo research on the numerous Clinton scandals. He'south angry about her distorting his record - on guns, on the auto bailout, on the crime bill -- but he'south largely kept his focus on the substantive differences between them. This includes the indictment on how she funds her campaigns and her collecting millions in speaking fees from Wall Str banks and other corporate interests -- an argument central to the case he's making.

Despite the relative mannerliness of the Democratic race, bringing the party together after the primaries won't be easy. Sanders has built a movement that's challenging the fundamental direction of the country and the central way the party does business (and business does the party). Those differences are much harder to paper over than personal insults issued by tired candidates in the NY hothouse. Both Sanders and Clinton will endorse whomever becomes the nominee, but Democrats will necessity a wingnut Republican opponent to assistance unite the party in the fall. Luckily, Republicans seem intent on serving one up.

READ ALSO
Buying @Haje: How I got my given title as my Twitter handle for $250

Buying @Haje: How I got my given title as my Twitter handle for $250

It involved a six-month campaign that included some light Internet stalking, badgering staff at Twitter, $250 and a visit to the patent office.

87
seven lessons CEOs can memorise from President Obama’s video strategy

seven lessons CEOs can memorise from President Obama’s video strategy

How to connect the network Regardless of your political orientation, it's tough to argue against the success of the digital media strategy that President Obama and his team implemented to be engaged in millions of Americans over the past two terms.

94
Rohnert Park Executive Seek Owner Of Wayward Goat Found In Starbucks

Rohnert Park Executive Seek Owner Of Wayward Goat Found In Starbucks

At 5:12 a. m., public safety executive responded to a report of a goat found roaming around Wolf Den Plaza, located at the corner of Bodway Parkway and E Cotati Avenue, according to a public safety dispatcher.

52
two window washers rescued from scaffolding at Denver building

two window washers rescued from scaffolding at Denver building

The workers were on scaffolding several stories high at a building Saturday morning when a cable snapped, Fox thirty-one Denver reported.

113